Fyi….an investor asked for my thoughts on the themes
mentioned in an article in WORTH Magazine. .
Below you'll find parts of the discussion and views on each point raised in the article, in turn. Many global issues are addressed and currently form the backdrop into which our investment strategies are positioned. But please note: As always, the comments expressed here are for informational and entertainment purposes only and are not meant to be investment advice in any way!
Fyi.....
Below you'll find parts of the discussion and views on each point raised in the article, in turn. Many global issues are addressed and currently form the backdrop into which our investment strategies are positioned. But please note: As always, the comments expressed here are for informational and entertainment purposes only and are not meant to be investment advice in any way!
Fyi.....
Regarding the WORTH article “5 Key Investment Themes for
2014”, my opinion on each in turn:
“Emphasize stocks, especially non-US stocks, over
bonds”: I agree re overweighting stocks. I disagree about not
abandoning bonds. I’m out of bonds and expect to stay that way for a
while. I also agree that int’l equities are looking better on a relative
value basis vs US equities, but I still think that EM and other int’l markets
need to show some signs of stability before I’d allocate heavily directly
into that space. As you know, I’ve chosen the more defensive approach to
int’l exposure by owning large, multi-national US companies (or select
Europeans, like Unilever (UN)) that have been substantial footprints in global
markets.
“Complement core bond holdings with a multi-sector
approach”: I don’t like this whole section! The comments
about Tsys and investment grade bonds softening the blow should equities blow
up hasn’t really shown itself to work very well. Yes, historically, over
longer periods of time, bonds were viewed as hedges for equities, but as I
pointed out in a missive some time ago, the relationship is not rock solid and
when it doesn’t work, then you’re hurt both in stocks and in
bonds! Cash is not a bad thing to own when you expect equities to face
near- and mid-term headwinds, in an environment of generally rising interest
rates (as we expect in the US, possibly soon in the UK, and in many EM
countries that are using higher rates to defend their currencies and to fight
inflation). As for floating rate debt, while that might be good when
rates finally do rise, at the moment, what’s the yield? (I suspect
asymptotically approaching zero!). High yield bonds? My correlation
work shows that they often act like equities, so what kind of fixed income
hedge would that be for a falling equity market?! Distressed debt?
Maybe. But this space is very situation specific, real ‘alpha’. If you
have a distressed situation that you think could turn around even in a troubled
global economy, then that is true alpha and uncorrelated w/other assets.
As for ‘hedge funds’, I believe that market commentators are too flip when
bunching ‘hedge funds’ into ‘alternative’ assets. As you and I both
know, saying ‘invest in a hedge fund’ is like saying ‘eat a restaurant’!
Each has its own menu, its own chef, its own prices, its own expertise, its own
specific asset class or strategy of focus. Bottom line, if you expect
inflation, then I would not own bonds. I would select stocks that could benefit
from a rising price environment. And I’d add select commodity exposure,
either directly, or as I’ve done, through companies that would benefit from
higher commodity prices.
“Follow Europe out of its Dark Ages”: on
this we agree, though I’d be very selective and would not go too boldly into a
region that is saddled still with suffocatingly high levels of debt and tragically
high levels of unemployment, with a set of peripheral nations, though in less
bad shape now than in recent past, are still time bombs ready to
blow! The “summer-2012-Draghi-I’ll save the Euro at all costs” effect is
still helping Europe stabilize. And each day that goes by when countries
like Spain and Italy can enjoy 10yr yields below 4% is a day in the right
direction. But budget deficits are still a problem, and with this past
year’s run-up in the Euro, global competitiveness is challenged.
“Emerging markets will re-emerge”: I
agree. I do think that much of the timing of this depends on China and
its effectiveness in rolling out the reforms that were outlined in late 2013 at
their last Communist Party Plenum. On this, I’m optimistic. Also,
for the past few years, I have focused on the Emerging Markets infrastructure
build-up, investing in companies related to that effort, such as construction,
machinery and other business services. I’ve switched the central focus to
one that will capture a growing middle-class in Emerging Market countries, who
will likely have more and more discretionary spending habits over time.
Again, I’d tread carefully in terms of direct EM exposure at this time.
Many of the countries are experiencing great amounts of stress as Fed tapering
has sparked capital flight out of EM, which has hurt their currencies, which in
turn, has led many of the EM central banks to engage in counter-cyclical
policies of raising rates in order to defend their currencies and to fight inflation.
There are many large multi-national US companies that have over 50% of their
business in global markets. I’d focus there first, and only slowly add to
direct EM exposure.
“Global synchronized growth could be 2014’s big
surprise”: I think this is correct. As I mentioned, I think
China holds the key. Success on their reforms will have a much larger
domino effect on global markets than if the US GDP inches up. Europe too is
important to watch. Stability needs to reign there, or else we’ll have
turbulence and fears of a global financial crisis. Finally, the article
only mentions ‘geopolitical events’ almost as a ‘by-the-way’. I think
geopolitical events could be pivotal. If we have a major oil supply
disruption from the tumult in the Middle East, that will especially impact
Europe, China and Japan. If we have any form of rogue sovereign action,
such as North Korea striking South Korea, global markets will be unraveled.
I think the US holds one big geopolitical event this year, being the mid-term
elections. A big shift in either direction in terms of either house of
Congress could have serious market impact.
Please let me know if you have any questions and if you’d
like to hear more specifics about holdings and how they fit in with these global
views.
Best,
Ed
Please continue to visit Soos Global Market Musings for updates.
(Sign up to "Follow by Email"! And share with others!)
(Please note: This article is solely meant to be thought provoking and is not in any way meant to be personal investment advice. Each investor is obligated to opine and decide for themselves as to the appropriateness of anything said in this article to their unique financial profile, risk tolerances and portfolio goals).
Disclaimer: Please read and consider important information related to all communication made by Soos Global on this site by clicking here.
Additional Disclaimer: currently long many stocks/ETFs. Positions may change at any time without notice.
No comments:
Post a Comment